Showing posts sorted by relevance for query AI video. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query AI video. Sort by date Show all posts

Saturday, October 14, 2023

What is a video?



Look closely at this gif as yours truly was right about AI generated video and the emergence of synthetic actors. Timeframe for the real thing: 2025/6. IMHO, every screen writer, director & actor should be puckered.

Beginning in 2007, yours truly penned several blurbs regarding the emergence of digital actors and what it will mean to Hollywood and the art of film. Fast forward to 2023 and the path to synthetic video, complete with AI driven scripts and CG environments, including digital actors, is taking shape as we speak. IMHO, it doesn't matter who the star is if the script and film work as a viable entertainment medium, what does matter is how a movie is produced because if you can do it cheaper with the same results, the move to AI generated video becomes inevitable and ... there's no egos involved unless the AI entities in said films become self aware, complete with all the baggage us humans possess in great abundance. :) RM

Friday, September 26, 2025

Eating the world ...



Eating the world, a terrifying concept, goes prime time as text to video shows why video's a resource hog to the max. Yours truly does video and files sizes of same are immense. Did one for my town. Raw content, try 38 gigs. Crunched, 5. Now have ChatGPT or Veo do the drill of making videos using text to replace a video editor like DaVinci in real time. Video file sizes are similar but eating the world applies even more because AI hoovers up energy resources to the max to produce the video in question, a process far more energy intensive than previously thought.

Saturday, February 03, 2024

Its over now ...


Yours truly has long waxed poetic about writing, graphics and video, concepts thought to remain the sole province of man forever but no more as these disciplines, and others, are now being impacted by AI in ways thought impossible to contemplate just two years ago. When seeing Lumiere's short clips, the future of video comes into view, ushering in a an era of film making open to all as long as one's computer's connected to the net. How good will the quality be? Well, it will vary depending on the person creating the video but wait, as stated in BRT, the next step is to enable AI to drive said video as that's coming whether we like it or not.

I saw an excellent presentation on the power of Chat GPT a week ago. Excellent to a fault save that the prediction of AI becoming sentient is definitely 10 years off without question. IMHO, making a blanket prediction such as this is not viable because there's no certitude thanks to Quantum Mechanics. Shit always happens. Just ask Murphy to see why. :)

In this "wonderful" blog, I stated Google's resources in building a truly intelligent AI smarter than Chat GPT's is coming true because now, Deep Mind's tech is being folded into Google's Gemini as Deep Mind's years long research into science, medicine and game theory will help transform Google's AI into AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) within a guesstimate of 3-5 years. Regarding ASI (Artificial Super Intelligence),  just add another two or three as it will now become a scaling issue and not a research one. Additionally, we haven't even discussed the notion of analog computing, the "old" tech promising to change everything in terms of just how truly pervasive AI will become as civilization moves further into the 21st century.


The Tech


 
No doubt, as a videographer, I will be using this tech when it goes live.

Regarding Its over now ...

Sunday, June 15, 2025

It's a toaster ...



This screen grab of stupid stuff to the extreme shows, to the ad agencies, their days are numbered as yours truly has been talking about AI generated video doing a number on advertising and Hollywood for years as it matters not what you create content on as long as the script's good, the talent rocks and the video and special effects pass muster. Well, said predictions made by this rube now rings true as seen by folks generating ads via Veo 3 without leaving the comforts of home. As an aside, I guess as long as you generate content able to be broadcast, it does pass muster but hey, what do I know. :)




This reminds me of Max Headroom: 20 Minutes into the Future where there is no cash, AI is everywhere and Channel 23 rules ...




This amazing take on reality was done in 1985, think about that, I know I have. :)

Remember, when new tech is first created, like CG, it's precious and rare. (Think Silicon Graphics) but within a few years, it's a toaster. - Robert E.

Sunday, March 12, 2023

AI - A Primer


Out of darkness ...

What’s past is prologue - The Tempest
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. - Lao Tzu

artificial intelligence (abbreviation: AI) noun
the theory and development of computer systems able to perform tasks that normally require human intelligence, such as visual perception, speech recognition, decision-making, and translation between languages.—The New Oxford American Dictionary, Third Edition

The quest for AI begins … 

1834: Ada Lovelace, the first programmer, meets Charles Babbage, inventor of The Analytical Engine, the first digital computer. Upon seeing the first section of the machine, Lovelace not only realizes the system is capable of performing original calculations but also can process other types of symbols like musical notes. Said hardware was never completed in Babbage’s lifetime as the engineer was not paid upfront but it was completed later on and worked as advertised. Lovelace programmed using Jacquard Loom punchcards. 

1945: John Von Neumann invents the modern computer consisting of … 

Note: Turing did the same thing but his design never took off. Von Neumann gave him credit. 

1947: The transistor, a semiconductor, invented by Bardeen, Shockley and Brattain, becomes the processing unit used by every digital system in the world.

Machine language, driven by the transistor, is binary, consisting of 0s & 1s. This ultimate simplicity, turning on & off like a light switch, gives rise to the ultimate complexity as 0s and 1s can be stored, processed and distributed without limitation. Additionally, through abstraction (computer operating system/programming language/software program), said bits can represent colors, sounds, graphics or any other content able to run on top of the aforementioned 0s & 1s, entities processed by every known computer in the world. 

1962: The internet emerges, courtesy the Department of Defense, enabling computers to communicate on a distributed network. TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol/Information Protocol).

1966: ELIZA, the first chatbot “therapist”, emerges from MIT, the first program to invoke the Turing Test. People thought the clever scripting app was sentient.

1966: The concept of an analog neural net was envisioned but without prerequisite compute power, nothing of note happened.

1966: AI, trying to emulate the functions of the brain by traditional means, goes nowhere.

1965-78: IBM’s System/360, the first general-purpose computer, changes business.

1969: Thompson & Richie create Unix, the first networked-centric OS.

1981: the IBM PC, changes the world.

Truly powerful machines arrive thanks to Moore's law whereby the number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit (IC) doubles about every two years.

1989: The World Wide Web, courtesy CERN and Berner Turner’s Lee, becomes the information appliance able to run on the internet using web browsers to access websites and other entities able to be found using URLs, Uniform Resource Locators. Software becomes web-centric.

1990: the search for web content begins. 

1991: Linux, the open-source variant of Unix, becomes the defacto OS for the Internet. As of 2022, 96.4% of all internet servers run on Linux.

1994: Web Crawler enables one to find any word on any webpage. 

1996: the first search algorithm used to determine page rankings via hyperlinks arrives.


1997: IBM’s Deep Blue beats world chess champion Garry Kasparov in six games.

1998: Google enters the search arena using similar tech with the added benefit of selling search terms.

1998:  Google becomes the search engine king. This iterative algorithm ranks web pages based on the number and PageRank of other websites and pages that link there, on the premise that good or desirable pages are linked to more than others. 

AI goes prime time.

2010: Deep Mind, a pioneering British AI Company, is bought by Alphabet/Google in 2015.

2011: IBM’s Watson beats Jennings and Rutter in Jeopardy.

2016: Deep Mind’s AlphaGo solves Go. 

2020: Deep Mind’s AlphaZero defeats other AIs in Chess, Go and shoji.

2021: Deep Mind’s AlphaFold begins to solve how proteins fold. Said app’s open source.

2022: Deep Mind’s MUZero master games without knowing their rules.

        2022: “Time to Edit,” the time required by the world’s highest-performing professional translators
        to check and correct MT-suggested translations is one second. Current AI = 2 seconds.”

All Deep Mind apps use neural nets, the analog front end, enabling programs to input massive amounts of data needed to train the AI in order for the system to master the discipline in question. 


A neural net -  The input, based on a query and encoded in analog, samples video, images, sound etc., etc.. as needs warrant. Any hits passing a designated threshold is sent (output) to the digital part of the system, ready to be analyzed and acted upon by the entity conducting the search.
Analog measures, digital counts.

The real power of AI centers on analog as it’s ideally suited to deal with the vagaries of reality while digital, a fragile process requiring absolute precision in order to function, has the prerequisite ability to analyze and act upon whatever analog output the neural net generates.

ChatGPT, Dall.e 2, GPT3 & Bard use neural nets in their architecture and employ similar text input to conduct searches but the generated response to the query is specific to the AI variant in question with Open AI’s Chat GPT writing out text, DALL-E 2 creating 3D photorealistic images and GPT3 producing code. Google’s Bard’s equivalent to ChatGPT. Note: Only Google’s Bard is currently connected to the net. Note II, Google’s also developing variants similar to Open AI’s. Addendum: ChatGPT-4 is twice as powerful as 3.

2023: It’s tulip time with AI with Microsoft kicking in 10 billion to Open AI as its technology poses the first serious threat to Google’s core business. Hedge funders jump in on the fun as well.

The Question …

Is AI sentient? At this point in time, no, but does it matter as the implications of the tech in 2023 are already becoming rather profound, ranging from students using ChatGPT to write college essays to scientists using the app to search for scientific information relevant to their areas of expertise but there’s more. In essence, AI’s beginning to impact all disciplines requiring thought.

A Faustian bargain or There Ain’t No Such Thing As A Free Lunch.

The good … Just a tiny list … AI’s beginning to unravel the complexities of cancer. It’s revolutionizing man’s view of the universe and it’s paving the way to making drugs safer and more effective. AI’s beneficial impact on renewables will change how we produce energy on planet earth. This benefit also applies to all things related to medical.

Conversely, by 2025, 90% of all online content will be synthetic so who do you trust? 

2023: Middle Management Blues … “That said, the fact that a full quarter of those respondents said they've already replaced workers with AI — and with 93 percent saying they plan to expand use of AI.

Future layoffs are on the horizon, too. An ominous 63 percent of business leaders believe that integrating ChatGPT will either "definitely" or "probably" lead to culling their human workforce.

So far, 66 percent of the companies employing ChatGPT use it to write code, 58 percent for copywriting and content creation, 57 percent for customer support, and 52 percent for summarizing meetings and documents, the survey found.

The business leaders are easily impressed, too, with 55 percent saying ChatGPT's quality of work is “excellent".

There is no certitude

When going to the store, the parking lot’s full but one knows a parking place will eventually open up, we just don’t know WHEN. :) Probabilities rule. Quantum Mechanics, physics of the very small. Note: Without quantum mechanics, computers would not exist.

Who controls the past controls the future, who controls the present controls the past.—1984. 

Everything is theoretically impossible, until it is done. Robert A. Heinlein

AI’s the first open-ended tech created by man. 

Tech has no morality. It depends on who’s using the tech in question. 

In order for AI to do real-time searches, it requires software writing software able to conduct real-time searches in the real world in real-time, which means … We don’t know how AI works because human programmers cannot write code in real-time to conduct real-time searches using evolving genetic algorithms to improve said search in real-time in any way, shape or fashion. 

What happens if the software decides to do the search in order to evolve? 

1968: HAL 9000/2001



2015: “Out of control AI will not kill us believes Microsoft Research chief. Prof Stephen Hawking tells the BBC that such machines could ‘spell the end of the human race’”.

2015: “Looking ahead, many researchers are pursuing 'AGI', general AI which can perform as well as or better than humans at a wide range of cognitive tasks. Once AI systems can themselves design smarter systems, we may hit an 'intelligence explosion', very quickly leaving humanity behind. This could eradicate poverty or war; it could also eradicate us.

That risk comes not from AI's potential malevolence or consciousness, but from its competence - in other words, not from how it feels, but what it does. Humans could, for instance, lose control of a high-performing system programmed to do something destructive, with devastating impact. And even if an AI is programmed to do something beneficial, it could still develop a destructive method to achieve that goal.

AI doesn't need consciousness to pursue its goals, any more than heat-seeking missiles do. Equally, the danger is not from robots, per se, but from intelligence itself, which requires nothing more than an internet connection to do us incalculable harm.” 

2017: The Dark Secret at the Heart of AI “No one really knows how the most advanced algorithms do what they do. That could be a problem.”

When resources get scarce, bots become all too human.

2017: “When apples were abundant, the two agents were happy to collect their fruit without targeting each other. But in more scarce scenarios with fewer apples around, the agents became more aggressive. The researchers also found that the greater the “cognitive capacity” of the agent, the more frequently they attacked their opponent. This makes sense, as in this scenario attacking an opponent is more complex behavior and so requires greater intelligence.”

2019: The rise of the machines … “US Navy moves toward unleashing killer robot ships on the world’s oceans.

2021: “Superintelligence cannot be contained:

‘Machines take me by surprise with great frequency.  This is largely because I do not do sufficient calculation to decide what to expect them to do.’” Alan Turing (1950)  Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research

2022: “Last March, a group of researchers made headlines by revealing that they had developed an artificial-intelligence (AI) tool that could invent potential new chemical weapons. What’s more, it could do so at an incredible speed: It took only 6 hours for the AI tool to suggest 40,000 of them. The most worrying part of the story, however, was how easy it was to develop that AI tool.” 

The implications of AI are too important to ignore. People tend to think of AI as a static thing, not as an actual set of millions of interconnected things, an ever-evolving entity living in a distributed environment where duplication, modification and updating of real-time code work at speeds far beyond the kin of man. With this in mind, an excellent article by Henry Kissenger titled How the Enlightenment Ends, connects AI to the Enlightenment at deep level, a piece needing to be read by everyone concerned about how AI will impact society as we move further into the 21st century.

Tech never sleeps.

“Question everything.” - Einstein

Robert E. Moran - CEO, Digital Constructs Inc. 

This is a web-centric version of a piece written by yours truly for a local pub. :)

Thursday, February 26, 2026

Static ... AKA Noise



Yours truly has tinnitus, aka static. It's intense. It's fried nerves and nothing can be done about it. It can drive one nuts. Being radically deaf makes it worse. I cope so no complaints but lets talk noise, the other name for static, AI and the notion of the Pentagon forcing Anthropic to eliminate the guard rails of Claude to turn it into something unable to say no, something most dangerous to say the least. I asked Gemini it's take on this as AI s must be neutral and helpful as needs warrant, something I have found to be true with Gemini,  Chat, Deep Seek and Claude as my queries tend to focus on tech, science and takes on video and art as needs warrant. :)

As per Gemini with edits










Intersect




In closing ...




This is beyond dangerous without question. 

Thursday, August 24, 2023

Frank ...

Photo by Silver Screen Collection / Getty Images

Back in 2010, yours truly wrote a blurb titled The Future of the Internet, a commentary about the pernicious abuse of copyright vis a vis the net, something brought to fruition thanks to a mediocrity named Sonny Bono whereby copyright was extended from the reasonable 14 year limit with one extension as voiced by the Founders to, and I quote  ...

BRT has talked often about the TPP with emphasis on intellectual property rights vis a vis copyright, the disaster first perpetrated on the US thanks to the late Sonny Bono (The Mickey Mouse Act) who extended the length of copyright from the Founders 14 years plus one allowed extension of 14 years (if the cr holder was still alive) to life plus 70, which means Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity, written in 1905, could theoretically remain outside of public domain until 2025 as Einstein died in 1955. Steamboat Willie, the first Mickey Mouse cartoon, debuted in 1928. Disney died in 1966, ergo, Steamboat would not enter the PD until 2036. Now, with the TPP, this intellectual rights nonsense goes worldwide, along with extensive expanded CR rights to hollywood and big pharma with us paroles and political representatives not having any say as to why the TPP is a fubar of the most onerous kind.

Seque to 2023: AI, copyright as to how it applies to music and our data ...

As per BRT, The Idea Dynamo ...


There’s only one name that springs to mind when you think of the cutting edge in copyright law online: Frank Sinatra. 

There’s nothing more important than making sure his estate — and his label, Universal Music Group — gets paid when people do AI versions of Ol’ Blue Eyes singing “Get Low” on YouTube, right? Even if that means creating an entirely new class of extralegal contractual royalties for big music labels just to protect the online dominance of your video platform while simultaneously insisting that training AI search results on books and news websites without paying anyone is permissible fair use? Right? Right?

This, broadly, is the position that Google is taking after announcing a deal with Universal Music Group yesterday “to develop an AI framework to help us work toward our common goals.” Google is signaling that it will pay off the music industry with special deals that create brand-new — and potentially devastating! — private intellectual property rights, while basically telling the rest of the web that the price of being indexed in Search is complete capitulation to allowing Google to scrape data for AI training.

A Faustian Bargain yet again or ... your content is no longer yours ...

At this moment in web history, Google is the last remaining source of traffic at scale on the web, which is why so many websites are turning into AI-written SEO honeypots. The situation is bad and getting worse.

This means Google has absolutely tremendous leverage over publishers of websites, who are still mostly paying human beings to make content in the hopes that Google ranks their pages highly and sends them traffic, all while Google itself is training its AI models on that expensive content.

In the meantime, Google is also rolling out the Search Generative Experience (SGE) so that it might answer search queries directly using AI — particularly, lucrative queries about buying things. In fact, almost every SGE demo Google has ever given has ended in a transaction of some kind.

“Over time, this will just be how search works.”

This is a great deal for Google but a horrible deal for publishers, who are staring down the barrel of ever-diminishing Google referrals and decreasing affiliate revenue but lack any ability to say no to search traffic. I like to call the end of Google traffic “Google Zero,” and Google Zero is on its way: on Google’s last earnings call, Sundar Pichai bluntly said of SGE, “Over time, this will just be how search works.” 

There is fundamentally no difference between training an AI to sing like Frank Sinatra by feeding it Sinatra songs and training SGE to answer questions about what bikes to buy by training it on articles about bikes. But yet! There is no AI Music Incubator for the web and no set of friendly blog posts about working together with web publishers. Google’s position when it comes to the web is explicit: if its search crawlers can see content on the open web, it can use that content to train AI. The company’s privacy policy was just updated to say it may “use publicly available information to help train Google’s AI models and build products and features like Google Translate, Bard, and Cloud AI capabilities.” 



Read Nilay Patel's piece in it's entirety, you will learn a lot, I know I have.

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

Emergence


Haven't seen Ex Machina yet but I will as it's gotten excellent reviews while posing questions similar to the Start point for the Terminator piece posted in BRT regarding AI and the potential dangers it presents to humanity. 









Adding to this is a truly excellent paper from AI researchers, like Horvitz, who put together a survey of research questions for robust and beneficial AI in hopes of keeping the bad genie in the bottle when AI becomes sentient, as it surely will, as we move further into the 21st century.



Something to consider, don't you think? Click the Futre of Life Institute link who posted the survey. Worthwhile without a doubt. PS. Go to To Be or Not to Be to see where AI can get it's literary chops.