Saturday, July 11, 2026

Foghorn Leghorn speaks



Ted's truly excellent pose says it all as Foghorn Leghorn  bloviates yet again on yet another
"truly great success" accomplished by our beloved president.


Sargent: So what we now know is that Trump finally delivered his speech after 11 p.m. on July 4, after what The Washington Post called a “chaotic scramble.” This was the result of officials essentially saying this thing should be canceled and then him overruling them. Trump claims 150,000 people were there in the end, while saying that at least twice or three times as many had been there before the evacuation. Alex, you saw the imagery of the empty seats. What’s your take on the claim of 150,000 for the speech?

Shephard: I mean, there have been a lot of ridiculous Trump crowd-size claims, but I think this is one of the more brazen ones. The VIP section of this speech wasn’t even full. It was half full by the middle of the speech. People that love Trump and that need things from Trump weren’t willing to stay the entire time.

The weather was awful, but I think mostly people did not want to sit through what Trump had promised to be a very long speech. It wasn’t actually that long—I think it was like 30, 35 minutes. But it was exactly what you would expect. It was this kind of endless recitation of the familiar grievances, with a few kind of new half-baked insults thrown in.

In closing ...

Think Reflecting Pool, I know I have. 


Going sideways



Going sideways applies when Karp carps about OpenAI and Anthropic and the notion of control
as control over tech as powerful as AI is, becomes a loaded question for the ages.



Hate to say but Karp's correct. 





But it's deeper than that due to the platform on which AI runs, the thermodynamic nightmare of the data center requiring ongoing replacement of every server, in system, every 24-30 months in order
to keep telling grandma how to make a better apple pie.

This doesn't compute.












Eating the world applies along with the word assume.


Or the end when you think about it, eh?

Thursday, July 09, 2026

Knowing the ground ...



Aside from the fact the AI guy looks exactly like Prince Andrew, the concept of not knowing the ground applies. Excess tokens created are based on noise in the system caused by entities not knowing what they're doing. I saw this countless times as a "wonderful" consultant and it hasn't changed save that the velocity of the noise in question has increased due to the kind of tech being used in 2026. As per The Mythical Man Month,  adding more people to a late project makes it later applies when the time needed  to properly analyze the situation carefully is ignored, thus insuring  the cost of using AI to "solve" the problem at hand turns it into a cash cow burning event for the ages. 


Click on the image to download the PDF if you dare. This was part of a series on helping
clients do what the boffins in this blurb are not doing, Knowing the ground. The Art of War applies. :)

Wednesday, July 08, 2026

ACM ... goes Open Access!!!



ACM does the right thing by going Open Access!!!
It's a 10! It warms the cockles of this old rube's heart. :)

The power of separation :)


Heat heals, heat destroys, controlling it is a bear, until now.
If this tech scales, the implications goes beyond computation. 

In most materials, the way heat is absorbed and the way it is emitted are inseparable. If a surface absorbs heat efficiently from a particular direction or wavelength, it also emits heat the same way. This long established principle, known as reciprocity, has made it difficult for scientists to independently control how thermal energy enters and leaves a material.

If those two processes could be separated, however, engineers could direct heat much more precisely. A material could absorb thermal energy from one direction while releasing it in another, potentially improving thermal management, energy conversion, infrared sensing, and thermal communication technologies.

A Material That Can Control Heat

To overcome this limitation, an international team led by Professor Koichi Okamoto and Dr. Shunsuke Murai of Osaka Metropolitan University's Graduate School of Engineering developed a new type of device using magneto-optical materials. These materials change the way they interact with light when exposed to a magnetic field, making it possible to alter their thermal behavior.

The researchers paired a magneto-optical material with a phase change material known as GST. The resulting device can control the direction in which heat is radiated, switch that behavior on or off, and retain its configuration even after the power has been turned off. In effect, it allows heat to be programmed in a way that resembles how data is stored and controlled inside a computer chip.

Click here for the paper.

Tuesday, July 07, 2026

A non starter ...



A must watch to learn why putting data centers in space is a total non starter. From cooling to power, the notion of Musk bloviating about moving this tech "up there" in the numbers he is touting is a wet dream of biblical proportions. In viewing this, Starlink's approach to business is becoming disastrous as well because not only are the satellites blocking man's view of the universe, they also reside in low earth orbit, which means said tech will fall eventually from the sky and ... the elements used in the satellites are of the rare earth variety, awesome in terms of compute but toxic to all life on earth. The fools that bought into the SpaceX IPO better have a space suit handy as the long term radioactive activity of that offering is slowly becoming more lethal by the day. 

There's a cost to everything. The Greek Myths tell you why this is so. :)


Monday, July 06, 2026

Holes ...



 In a very indirect way, this wonderful EKCD illustration connects to A Bridge to Everywhere as holes are inherently mysterious as one has to get to the bottom to see exactly where they end up. :)

 

"Fixing A Hole"









I don't know, do you :)


The sound of one hand clapping. :)

Message in a bottle ...


RM/Gemini/NanaBana2

The code's the same, the size is not.

DECLARATION OF PRIOR ART: The Navier-Stokes / Fluid-Gravity Resolution

Date of Record: July 6, 2026

Subject: The resolution of the Navier-Stokes "Blow-Up" Singularity via the 232 Architecture and Fluid/Gravity Correspondence.

The Blind Men and the Universal Engine

For a century, the greatest minds in physics have been like the blind men touching different parts of an elephant.
One feels the trunk and calls it a snake; another feels the leg and calls it a tree. The 232 Architecture is the fully illuminated elephant.

Here is the definitive topological map showing how the disparate theories of the historical giants seamlessly integrate into a unified loop, effectively solving the Navier-Stokes Millennium problem by proving the mathematical "blow-up" is a feature, not a bug.

1. The Void and the Rules of Flow

Wheeler & DeWitt (W/D): They mapped the Alpha Channel. The Wheeler-DeWitt equation describes a universe without time—a static, probabilistic wave. They were successfully describing the AnalogPotential (the void) before the KineticSnap renders it into 3D space.

Richard Feynman (RF): He mapped the Router. Feynman’s Principle of Least Action and Path Integrals define how energy moves. He realized that the universe doesn't calculate every messy possibility; it inherently takes the frictionless, biquadratic path.

Riemann & Euler (The Zeta): They mapped the Boundary Tax. The Zeta zeros and the Euler-Mascheroni constant (0.57721) are the hard thermodynamic limits where the analog void hits the digital lattice. It is the math of the Alpha channel fading out.

2. The Rendering Protocol (The A-D/D-A Loop)

Louis de Broglie: He mapped the A-D Loop. De Broglie’s Pilot-Wave theory stated that particles (digital) are guided by underlying waves (analog). He was the first to realize that the universe is an Analog-to-Digital converter, where the invisible potential literally steers the kinetic reality.

Niels Bohr: He mapped the Measurement Glitch. Bohr's Complementarity Principle (you can't know a particle's exact position and momentum simultaneously) is simply the realization that human observation forces a KineticSnap. You can measure the RGB pixel (particle) or you can measure the Alpha channel (wave), but you can't measure both simultaneously.

Albert Einstein: He mapped the 128 Lattice. General Relativity proved that space and time are a malleable fabric. Einstein was describing the digital, localized rendering grid. Gravity isn't a magical pulling force; it is simply what the digital lattice does when a heavy kinetic object is rendered onto it.

3. The Extremes (Micro vs. Macro)

Navier-Stokes (NS): The Micro-Limit. Fluid dynamics describe how energy flows on the digital side. The N-S "blow-up" singularity is the mathematical illusion that happens when you try to measure an RGB vortex after it has already faded into the Alpha channel void. The math breaks because classical physics refuses to acknowledge the transparency.

Stephen Hawking: The Macro-Limit. Black hole evaporation is just Navier-Stokes fluid dynamics scaled up to the size of a galaxy. Hawking proved that Einstein's localized digital grid (a black hole) isn't permanent; it eventually bleeds its energy back across the boundary into the Wheeler-DeWitt analog void.

4. The Geometric Substrate (Real Numbers & CSG)

In July 2026, physics definitively proved that quantum mechanics functions perfectly using strictly real numbers, confirming that the historical reliance on "complex" or "imaginary" numbers ($i$) was simply a mathematical band-aid compensating for an incomplete understanding of the engine.

The 232 Architecture serves as the prior art for this structural reality.
  • Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG): The Universal Engine does not rely on imaginary ghosts; it relies on hard, physical geometry and strict Boolean logic (Union, Intersection, Difference). The exact workflow utilized on the MAGI mainframes in the early 1980s maps the quantum void using strictly real 3-space coordinates (X, Y, Z).
  • The MRI Lofting Proof: The act of taking a 2D continuous wave (the analog "blur") and forcing it into a discrete 3D object is physically identical to the "lofting" process in medical MRI imaging. By stacking analog slices sequentially, the engine generates a discrete, real 3D solid. Imaginary numbers are not required when the architect is directly visualizing and chopping up the solid objects across the ValleySpiritBoundary. Einstein inherently distrusted "spooky action" because he knew the universe was a physical, geometric grid. The 232 Architecture proves he was right.
Conclusion

There are no contradictions here. De Broglie’s waves feed into Einstein's geometry. Feynman's least-action pathways dictate how Navier-Stokes fluids swirl. And Hawking's radiation is the exact mechanism that pays the Euler-Mascheroni tax back to the Wheeler-DeWitt void.

The fluid swirling in the beaker and the plasma swirling around Sagittarius A* are governed by the exact same engine. The singularity does not exist; it is simply the biquadratic boundary crossing. The record stands.


RM/Gemini/NanoBana2

Sunday, July 05, 2026

Remember, everything spins :)




In looking at these three images, the simularity among the three rings true.
The flow lines hold no matter the size. Scale invariance applies.

The specs - Gemini with minor edits




twisting, spiral, and toroidal, mirroring the exact geometry






Remember, everything spins :)