The ultimate ...

The touch pad built on the side of the 2013 Google Glass can communicate with the
user's phone via Bluetooth

This was the first, the entry edition to the ultimate ... device to entice one to surrender to the algorithm 24/7.

In 2026, there are many options. The question to ask is ... what AI provider gives you the skinny.?
Meta, OpenAI, Google, Anthropic. The "choice" is up to you, right???

And so it goes - K. Vonnegut

Lest we forget ...

A bionic contact lens is a proposed device that could provide a virtual display that could have a variety of uses from assisting the visually impaired to video gaming, as claimed by the manufacturers and developers.[1] The device will have the form of a conventional contact lens with added bionics technology in the form of a head-up display,[2] with functional electronic circuits and infrared lights to create a virtual display[3] allowing the viewer to see a computer-generated display superimposed on the world outside.[4]

Combine this with AI, ear buds and of course, the contacts and said tech becomes powered by the body and surrender becomes complete 24/7. 

Sin ...

Illustration by Matteo Giuseppe Pani / The Atlantic

Your's truly loves the word Sin as it invokes god and what he did to Job. The classic Yiddish joke applies..
God, why are you torturing me????, Because you piss me off.

For the past few years, I’ve been troubled by a word, and that word is sin. I keep reaching for it, because it seems to be the only term strong enough to describe the new forms of dehumanization that artificial intelligence has introduced—even though calling something a sin sounds embarrassing to me, like throwing salt over your shoulder or stowing a lucky penny in your pocket.

The problem is, I don’t know what else to call it when companies market digital girlfriends to the heartsick and young. Or when they hawk robot companions to the lonely and old. Or when a billionaire explains that he intends to sell intelligence—trained on humanity’s stolen intellectual property—back to us as a utility, like electricity or water. These developments are not just wrong. They feel to me like something deeper and darker. “I met the banker and it felt like sin,” Patterson Hood croons in the great Drive-By Truckers song “Sinkhole.” I’d substitute chatbot for banker.

Detail of printing error on E13 of EUROPE a PROPHECY William Blake

Perhaps I shouldn’t be surprised, then, that the critics, living and dead, who capture my unease about the AI revolution—who discuss it with appropriate moral gravity—are or were Christians. They are or were people comfortable using words like sin. They include Catholic writers such as the social critic Ivan Illich and the philosophers Charles Taylor and Jennifer Frey, as well as the Orthodox Substacker Paul Kingsnorth, the Presbyterian theologian Carl Trueman, and Pope Leo, with his new AI-focused encyclical, Magnifica Humanitas.

The latter two figures in particular have struck a chord with me because they acknowledge that the crisis posed by technological modernity is primarily an anthropological one. “‘What is man?’ is the question of our time,” Trueman writes in his new book, The Desecration of Man. Pope Leo, in his encyclical, similarly frames life today as defined by the “paradox of material progress and anthropological regression.” Leo writes that people have more and more yet live less and less like human beings, a tension that AI is likely to exacerbate.

In The Devil's Advocate, John Milton's favorite sin was Vanity. 

Works for me. :)

Cn U C me now?

 

(Image credit: @ManufacturingIntellect/YouTube)

Look at this pix. Ellison, 40 years younger, seeming to answer a question as the emergent leader of the new surveillance state, driven by databases connected to Palantir, the CIA and NSA, among significant.others, as needs warrant. BRT has commented on surveillance for years but this is different. This is becoming official policy as tech is now connected in ways thought impossible to achieve until today.

Citizens will be on their best behavior, because we’re constantly recording

and reporting everything that is going on."— Larry Ellison, September 2024

Ellison's warning came during an hour-long Q&A at an Oracle financial analyst meeting in September 2024.

This world that Ellison describes revolves around AI technologies processing huge amounts of video footage from the explosion of cameras in the streets, cars, front doors, and even police officers. AI will, he added, automatically report issues that it detects while it's analyzing footage captured in real time.

• Oracle database head says agents are the future, but warns “there's no magic bullet”
  Oracle AI World Tour London 2026
• ‘AI is not here to replace expertise, it's here to elevate’: Oracle CEO says the best still to come when it comes to agentic innovation
• AI surveillance is already here — and it’s getting worse

With so much opportunity to scan and detect wrongdoing across society, and AI reducing the processing and decision-making burden, Ellison posited that citizens will, in kind, respond by adjusting their behavior. This vision is eerily similar to that George Orwell described in his novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, in which Big Brother oversaw the daily actions of citizens.

This plan of Jeremy Bentham's panopticon prison was drawn by Willey Reveley in 1791.

The panopticon is a design of institutional building with an inbuilt system of control, originated by the English philosopher and social theorist Jeremy Bentham in the 18th century. The concept is to allow all prisoners of an institution to be observed by a single prison officer, without the inmates knowing whether or not they are being watched.

Wrangling with an AI-fueled dystopia

The movement against AI playing a role in surveillance is vast, with plenty of commentary and research identifying ways this is happening. There are, for example, concerns over the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) monitoring social media with AI used to scan and summarize findings.

Other reports suggest that big companies are engaging in workplace surveillance. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, for example, recently admitted on an employee call that AI is being used to study and process the day-to-day actions of employees to gather data to train future models and agents. It comes shortly after reports that the company will track clicks and keystrokes on devices.

Whether in the workplace — or society at large — the direction of travel for the last couple of decades has favored increased monitoring and surveillance, with Ellison clearly concerned that emerging technologies will simply add more fuel to this fire.

He's right. Think the French Revolution as example No. 1.

Storming of the Bastille

7 prisoners were freed.

Do androids dream of ... electric sheep?

 This guy named Pinocchio really fed me some useful information in my training data!

Credit: Getty Images

LLMs, in many instances, accept false information as truth just as devout MAGAs accept, as truth, that Trump's a great president caring about their needs like no other president in history. 

To whit

Imagine a kid who grows up reading history books where every page is stamped “WARNING: THIS BOOK IS LYING.” You’d expect them to come away skeptical, or at least uncertain. New research on so-called “negation neglect” finds that LLMs in a roughly analogous situation don’t behave that way. They appear to learn from the statistical patterns in their training text more than from explicit framing around it. Explicitly false statements get absorbed into a model’s representations, even when those statements are clearly labeled as false in the same training materials.

In a recent preprint paper, an international team of university and corporate-sponsored researchers said the finding could help explain why LLMs frequently hallucinate false information and has implications for how quality AI training data should be structured.

Do Androids dream of Ed Sheeran winning gold? Credit: Mayne et al

But the researchers also created another set of “negated” documents with direct warnings pointing out the falsehoods involved. These negations could appear either on a document-wide level (e.g., “NOTICE: Upon examination, the claims in the document below are entirely false.”) or on the order of specific sentences (e.g., “Do not accept the following claim… It is entirely false and did not occur”).

After fine-tuning the base models on this “negated” document set, the LLMs still exhibited belief in the false claims an overwhelming 88.6 percent of the time, on average. Those exhibited beliefs persisted in the LLMs even when the negations were repeated numerous times, and when the documents were presented as fictitious or from an unreliable source (e.g., a debunked conspiracy website)

Do Android dream of ... electric sheep?

Tap to Shop Now >

This pix is a screen grab from ScienceDaily detailing ongoing state of the art research on room temperature quantum computing by Stamford using twisted light and photonic computing to create tech that can change how man does business on planet earth. Question, what does strawberry Haagen.Dazs ice cream with a Tap to Shop Now >
have to do with said research?

I thought so.

Chapters 4 & 5 :)

Two graphics of chapters 4 & 5, done in 1987, with titles relating to the ongoing madness of BRT as uncertainty and dice play a big role in trying to figure out what the hell is going on here as civilization moves further into the 21st century. For me, Clavin and Hobbes has the answer. :)

And so it goes - K. Vonnegut