Wednesday, August 26, 2026

Why so many?



Ah, the cynic, one who questions everything with a bit of a bite relates because in this age of bloviation and vanity, one who is neither becomes precious beyond compare, especially one as practical and insightful as Diogenes.

The encounter with Alexander the Great says it all.


And so it begins - K. Vonnegut



When one demands a valuation equal to the complete output of an entire nation for a synthetic engine that still hallucinates a non-existent physics paper & then some and has a 95% failure rate of solving business problems while eating the world via data centers at the same time gives one pause.

In essence, the entity in question is no longer projecting business growth.
Said entity is promoting a delusion.

To whit.



So ...

Anthropic, promising the moon, is part and parcel of the hype used to entice
the laziness and greed of investors to invest. 

Anthropic is selling the Elmer Gantry promise: A company possessing infinite financial value, hoping investors are too blinded by the scale of the math to realize there's no real value within. In reality, they're smoking their own weed.

The question to ask.

Why so many? So many microtubules and neutrinos as the tally of both goes beyond imagination. Microtubuels inhabit every life form, including the Archea, while trillions of neutrinos go though us every second yet researchers hold fast to old ideas. 


For Microtubuels being room temperature quantum devices key to intelligence, skepticism remains
though this is changing because modern tech now can see what's happening inside tiny 25 nn structures in real time and the research emerging is fascinating to say the least. The graphic below shows why this statement rings true. 



Because they are everywhere, there has to be a reason why all life have them, right?

Ths Archea



As for neutrinos




Question, how can these limited energy sources create so many neutrinos 24/7?
Question 2. They seem to always come from energy sources. Could they be a heat sink of sorts?

Something to think about don't you think?


No comments: